<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radio Free Skaro #162 &#8211; Maloney Sandwich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radiofreeskaro.com/2009/10/09/radio-free-skaro-162-maloney-sandwich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radiofreeskaro.com/2009/10/09/radio-free-skaro-162-maloney-sandwich/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=radio-free-skaro-162-maloney-sandwich</link>
	<description>Quite possibly the most popular, most prolific and charmingly irreverent (but never irrelevant) Doctor Who podcast around.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooper</title>
		<link>http://www.radiofreeskaro.com/2009/10/09/radio-free-skaro-162-maloney-sandwich/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiofreeskaro.com/?p=1434#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Why do you consider the photo of the clapper as &quot;confirmation&quot; that the show will be promoted as &quot;Series 1&quot; ? It&#039;s two totally separate questions of what they refer to it internally versus what they promote the series as.  The Doctor Who Magazine reports on this issue are still suspect and should remain open to skepticism until the BBC or Moff or someone goes on record with a proper explanation or confirmation. Obviously, the idea of referring to it as series 1 *internally* makes complete sense and their reporting on that was clear. But, there still hasn&#039;t been any reliable confirmation that it will be promoted as such. Perhaps I&#039;m biased by think it to be such a daft idea so maybe I&#039;m holding out hope, but, at the moment, I&#039;d still say it hasn&#039;t been reliably confirmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you consider the photo of the clapper as &#8220;confirmation&#8221; that the show will be promoted as &#8220;Series 1&#8243; ? It&#8217;s two totally separate questions of what they refer to it internally versus what they promote the series as.  The Doctor Who Magazine reports on this issue are still suspect and should remain open to skepticism until the BBC or Moff or someone goes on record with a proper explanation or confirmation. Obviously, the idea of referring to it as series 1 *internally* makes complete sense and their reporting on that was clear. But, there still hasn&#8217;t been any reliable confirmation that it will be promoted as such. Perhaps I&#8217;m biased by think it to be such a daft idea so maybe I&#8217;m holding out hope, but, at the moment, I&#8217;d still say it hasn&#8217;t been reliably confirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

